Bolshevik revolution sparks suspicions in Scranton


Font size: [A] [A] [A]

Police Superintendent Lona B. Day got word that there was to be a "suspicious meeting" on Sunday night, June 29, 1919, at Lincoln Hall in Scranton. He stationed several plants at the hall that night.

Joseph Jukelis of New York had been speaking for an hour when one of the plants reported that the man had attacked the United States government in his speech. Mr. Jukelis and three others were arrested on suspicion of stirring up support for a Bolshevik-style revolution.

State Trooper Leo Jarteopsky had been in the hall that night and, two days later in court, testified that Mr. Jukelis had urged the crowd to find police officers and soldiers who understood the Lithuanian language and to provide them with circulars. Those circulars were, the authorities alleged, of a "revolutionary nature."

"When we get the soldiers and policemen with us, we will have the power to work against the government," Mr. Jukelis told the crowd, according to Trooper Jarteopsky.

Roy McHenry, an agent with the Department of Justice, was the next witness. "First he attacked the Catholic Church, priests and capitalists, and then the United States government," Mr. McHenry told the court. "Then he talked about spies."

Prosecuting Attorney Scragg asked that the man be held without bail, and Magistrate Williams ordered the defendant back to his cell.

Defending 'Reds'

Edward Robling, a former Socialist candidate for mayor of Scranton, was in the courtroom that day. When he heard the magistrate's order, he jumped from his seat.

"I protest against this man being sent to jail without a chance to give bail," Mr. Robling said. "I protest against these high-handed police court methods and demand that this man be given justice."

Magistrate Williams warned Mr. Robling: "Go back to your seat. Sit down. This is no place for a speech," and two policemen headed for Mr. Robling.

Then, the other three men who had been arrested with Mr. Jukelis, all of them residents of Scranton, were taken before Magistrate Williams. The same witnesses testified that these men had been selling literature of a seditious nature which violated Pennsylvania's antisedition law.

Mr. Robling again jumped to his feet, saying that he would like to defend the men. Magistrate Williams again ordered Mr. Robling to take his seat, and the prisoners were led from the courtroom.

But the events of the day were far from over. On his way from the courtroom, Mr. Robling stopped to protest to a reporter. While he was speaking, an off-duty police officer told Mr. Robling that he should be ashamed of himself and that he should be an American and not try to defend "the Reds."

The two men argued, then Mr. Robling moved out into a corridor where a crowd had been waiting. When the police officer came out, Mr. Robling began denouncing the police.

"Get out of here with that stuff," the police officer yelled. Then someone from the crowd rushed at Mr. Robling. With that, the entire mob attacked the man. The policemen in the building tried to stop the mob but couldn't. Mr. Robling was punched about the face, head and body.

Robling released

Mr. Robling finally made his way from the building. Once outside, he made another remark to the crowd, and they went at him again, knocking him to the pavement. Several patrolmen grabbed Mr. Robling and pulled him away from the crowd. They took him to a police cell for his own protection.

Mr. Robling was released later that day on a $25 deposit. He was charged with disorderly conduct. In court the next afternoon, his attorney asked for his dismissal, claiming the methods that had been used against him the previous day were against all law and order. Mr. Robling complained that police had led the attack on him and that there wasn't a "civilian" in the crowd that mobbed him.

Revolution abroad

Magistrate Williams chastised Mr. Robling for his actions in court the previous day and dismissed him, saying he had been "acting foolishly." Then the magistrate dismissed the man from court.

Mr. Robling was known about town before this incident. Not only was he a Socialist, he had been a Socialist candidate for mayor of Scranton.

The very day these court proceedings were taking place, the wireless in London reported that Bolshevik armies had taken control of two Russian cities: Perm, 70 miles east of Moscow, and Kungur, 50 miles southeast of Perm.

CHERYL A. KASHUBA writes on behalf of the Lackawanna Historical Society. She is co-author of the book "Scranton." Contact the writer at localhistory@timessham rock.com.







6 posted comments

What's the bid deal? We just elected a socialist president. The Democratic party needs to change its name to the Socialist party since now the banks, car industry, and soon healthcare are all nationalized. Go Communisim! Alive and well in the USA.
Steve 10/26/09 10:29
Nice post Rick. I think it's sad at how divisive things are today in this country. We should feel comfortable to use your freedom of speech in a responsible way to debate our ideas and viewpoints without the fear of an angry mob attacking us. However I know this is not the case in this county and country. Thanks to the 24-hour news cycle which requires a division in this country we are at each others throat more often than not. People like Steve who think our President is a socialist seemed to have failed basic world history. Moreover I don't think the idea of what's good for the country is good for you is entirely off base. Or that promoting volunteerism is some form of Mao style communism. It's sad that people have to listen so wholeheartedly to the likes of pundits.

We had a Vice President and President violate our rights as Americans in the name of "pre-emptive safety" an many more fronts than the current administration. Where were the nay-sayers then? Where were the gun toting "Americans" standing up when it came to light that the Bush administration was illegally tapping and spying on innocent American citizens? Or when we went into a war without just reason? How about when our President at the time would hold a rally on OUR TAXPAYING dime but not allow anyone who had a different opinion into the arena? Who had the widest anti-protesting buffer? Or who frequently staged town hall meetings with plants, and knew ahead who was going to ask what? Where were these freedom fighters then? Bailing an industry out to help stave off a depression and make an attempt to save jobs seems a much more acceptable use of the government than to spy and accuse Americans for exercising their rights.

Transplant 10/26/09 09:28
Poster Steve has to see reality. We in this country have no clue about Socialism except for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, SSI and of course, the healthcare that our elected ones in DC receive, that the rest of us do not.

So Mr. Robling, all those years ago, ran as a Socialist. That's his and everyone's choice to speak freely, criticize and offer other ideas. After all, we are supposed to be a free country.

Having read this very interesting piece, I find that those in power at the time wanted no challenge to their positions, just as we see exists currently in Scranton as well as in other cities.

Steve, this is a piece of our history. It's nice to see that once upon a time, more than just Democrats and Republicans were able to put forth their thoughts and positions.

Just because he was a Socialist doesn't mean he wasn't an American. He probably felt that he had a better way and in some ways, maybe yes, maybe no. At least he was able to be heard until those who felt threatend took him to the street. Those who beat him weren't arrested. That shows who beat him on the street and with SPD and the city government's blessings.

And for the record, we should remember that 40% of our nation's voting electorate is registered Independent/Third Party, leaving the remaining 60% divided between Republicans and Democrats.

So, Steve, what goes around comes around.

Thanks again to the Lackawanna Historical Society for sharing yet another piece of my hometown's history.

Rick

Rick

Rick 10/26/09 12:09
What's the bid deal? We just elected a socialist president. The Democratic party needs to change its name to the Socialist party since now the banks, car industry, and soon healthcare are all nationalized. Go Communisim! Alive and well in the USA.
Steve 10/25/09 05:24
Very interesting article. Couldn't help notice a lot of similarities contained herein. Hope the Times didn't decide to use this as a metaphoric comparison to current day events since it really doesn't apply.
Rolo Tomassi 10/25/09 09:31
"He stationed several plants at the hall that night." What were these, geraniums? Or did he plant several spies?
chryssie 10/25/09 08:50
Half Off Nepa

1/2 OFF NEPA

Today's Feature: Steve Pronko Diamond and Fine Jewelry - Card Value: $50 Sale Price: $25. - Earning Your Trust Since 1928!

Home for the Holidays Contest

Answer the trivia questions for your chance to win 4 tickets to the NEPA Philharmonic's "Home for the Holidays" concert.

Manhunt ends in West Scranton

A chaotic manhunt through West Scranton that started with state police firing shots at a suspect ended Friday night with the apprehension of a wanted man who two days earlier allegedly led authorities on a high-speed chase through the Midvalley. Derek


 

Manhunt ends in West Scranton

A chaotic manhunt through West Scranton that started with state police firing shots at a suspect ended Friday night with the apprehension of a wanted man who two days earlier allegedly led authorities on a high-speed chase through the Midvalley. Derek


 

Manhunt ends in West Scranton

A chaotic manhunt through West Scranton that started with state police firing shots at a suspect ended Friday night with the apprehension of a wanted man who two days earlier allegedly led authorities on a high-speed chase through the Midvalley. Derek